General
This course deals with the interpretation of the Forms of Architecture and of other forms of Art in relation to the socio-cultural context of each era. The main concernis the realization by the students that the relationship between thought and form is an interaction not subject to rational rules and thus free in this sense, while at the same time each form appears as a reified expression of the cultural context in which it manifests itself. Understanding forms as a result of thought, as well as the production of thought as a result of this understanding, are both parts of an interpretive open process of approaching historical truth in relation to Art and Architecture.
1. At first, there’s an attempt to explore the deeper relationships between man, space and forms, as well as the way in which man understands forms and the meaning that these forms bear. An introduction is made to the Aesthetic principles that help researchers understand how forms affect the viewer’s way of thinking, and thus become tools in their own creative process.
2. A more detailed examination of the following historical eras: Prehistory, Western Asia and Egypt, Greece, Rome, Eastern Roman Period (Byzantium), Romanesque and Gothic period. The aim is to interpret forms as carriers of meaning, to relate them to the collective goals of each era and their philosophical foundation.
Along with the examination of history, an introduction is made to contemporary Architecture and Art, again using aesthetic and philosophical principles.
Bibliography
ANDREAE B., “L’art de l’ancienne Rome”, ed. Mazenod, Paris 1973.
BOUDON PHILIPPE, “Sur l’espaxe architectural”, edit. Dunod, Paris 1971.
CHEVALIER J., “Les Grecs et les Romains”, ed. Planete, Paris 1967, “Dictionnaire des symboles”, Seghers 1974.
DAVY M.M., “Initiation a la symbolique Romane”, ed. Flammarion 1977.
DEMARGNE PIERRE, “La naissance de l’Art Grec”, ed. Gallimard 1974.
FULCANELLI, “Le mystere des Cathedrales”, ed. Pauvert, Paris 1964
GIEDION S., “La naissance de l’Art”, edit. De la Connaissance, Bruxelles 1965.
GOUVION C., VAN DE MERT F., “Le symbolisme des rues et des cites”, edit. Berg International.
GRABAR ANDRE, “L’age d’or de Justinien”, ed. Gallimard, Paris 1966, “Le premier art Cretien”, Gallimard, Paris 1964.
HAUTECOEUR, “Mystique et architecture, le symbolisme du cercle et de la coupole”, ed. A. et J. Picard et Cie, Paris 1954, “Histoire de l’Art”, ed. Flammarion 1959.
HEIDEGGER MAR., “Essais et conferences”, ed. Gallimard, Paris 1958,
HOFSTATTERHANS, “Gotique”, ed. L’Equerre, Suisse 1964.
KAUFMANN PIERRE, “L’experience emotionnelle de l’espace”, edit. J. Vrin,
Paris 1981.
LEVY P., SERAUD M., “Anthropologie de l’espace”, edit. C.C.I., Paris 1983.
MEUNIE LOUIS, L’architecture et la geometrie”, ed. Vincent, Freal et Cie,
Paris 1968.
MICHALOWSKI K., L’Art et l’ancienne Egypte”, ed. Mazenod, Paris 1973.
NORBERG-SCHULZ C., “La signification dans l’architecture occidentale”, ed. P. Mardaga, Bruxelles 1974, “Systeme logique de l’architecture”, ed. P. Mardaga, Bruxelles 1974.
PANOFSKY ERWIN, “Architecture gotique et pensee scolastique”, ed. de Minuit, Paris 1967.
PAPAIOANNOU K., “L’Art Grec”, ed. Mazenod, Paris 1972.
PAYOT DANIEL, “Le philosophie et l’architecte”, edit. An. Montaigne, Paris 1982.
PICARD GILBERT, “Empire Romain”, ed. L’Equerre, Paris 1964.
RIEGL ALOIS, “Grammaire Historique des Arts Plastiques”, ed. Klincksieck,
Paris 1978.
ZEVI BRUNO, “Apprendre a voir l’architecture”, ed. de Minuit, Paris 1959.